David Sacks weighed in on recent discussions about pacing the development of advanced artificial intelligence. Responding to calls from prominent AI figures advocating for slowing progress, Sacks encouraged these leaders to proceed with caution but without seeking external approval or regulatory intervention. He noted that the leading AI companies effectively hold a duopoly in frontier intelligence, measured by market share, revenue growth, and model capabilities. Sacks expressed skepticism about the need for suspending antitrust laws or forming cartels to manage AI development. He also criticized the perceived independence of certain evaluation groups, pointing out their financial and personnel ties to AI companies. According to Sacks, motivations to slow AI progress are not purely altruistic but also driven by concerns over product liability and market demands for safer, more predictable AI behavior. He emphasized that pacing innovation could foster more constructive regulatory discussions, especially given the challenges of achieving global agreements with countries like China. Ultimately, Sacks urged AI leaders to take responsibility for their pace of innovation without leveraging regulatory demands as bargaining tools, warning that failure to do so could be viewed as attempts at regulatory capture or political manipulation.